(603) 473-4694 info@fojolaw.com

Fojo Law Files Lawsuit Challenging Three More School Districts’ Face Mask Requirements

This morning, we filed another lawsuit challenging three New Hampshire school districts’ requirements that students wear face masks while in school, riding the bus, or participating in extracurricular activities. This lawsuit comes after we filed one against the Hollis/Brookline School District (School Administrative Unit #41) and a second one against the Bedford School District (School Administrative Unit #25) in late May.  Like those lawsuits, this one was filed on behalf of 17 sets of parents and their children residing in Atkinson, Danville, Epping, Londonderry, Plaistow, and Sandown, and challenging each school district’s requirement that students wear face masks or coverings while in school, riding the bus, or participating in extracurricular activities because they violate a New Hampshire statute (RSA 126-U:4) that prohibits schools from requiring restraints on children that restrict their breathing (including any restraint that involves covering the face or body with anything) or that restrict the normal function of a portion of their bodies. The lawsuit, like the first action we filed on behalf of Mary Rivard last year, the action we filed last year challenging the City of Nashua’s face mask ordinance, and the action we filed challenging Governor Sununu’s closure of New Hampshire schools, also includes an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order enjoining each school district from enforcing its face mask requirement.  The motion can be found here. The lawsuit alleges that requiring children to wear face masks or coverings contradicts one or more of the prohibitions contained in RSA 126-U:4.  Wearing a mask requires a child to cover his or her face with certain material (whether a surgical mask or a cloth mask), mechanically restricts a child’s breathing...